"I am saddened to
learn that #Hopi sacred cultural objects are being put up for auction today in
Paris."
Since the Native American
Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) passed in 1990, American institutions
receiving federal funding have returned hundreds of thousands of cultural items
to their tribal owners. Often, specific repatriation offices and individuals are staffed to facilitate the safe return of objects
(and human remains) to their rightful owners. It seems, however, that foreign
nations fear similar processes of repatriation.
65 of 70 Hopi masks grossed
931,000 Euros ($1.2 million) during last Friday’s controversial auction in
Paris. Five went unpurchased. Hopi members expressed that these items had been stolen from Hopi altars
or confiscated by missionaries at the Arizona reservation during the 1930s and
1940s. Hopi members and their allies attempted to raise awareness about the
sale of their sacred ritual objects – Katsinam (known as “friends”). These
objects have a spiritual connection to the ancestors of today’s 18,000 Hopi peoples
and are said to embody the spirits themselves. The French, however, were
unsympathetic to requests for return. It was reported that the auction house
suggested that the Hopi buy back the objects for themselves, since they believe
that “art” in private collections cannot be considered sacred. Only one of the objects
(selling for $4,900) was purchased with the intent to repatriate.
A judge’s ruling allowed
the auction to proceed as planned, though protestors disrupted the sale
numerous times. How should we re-evaluate old debates
over art ownership (the Elgin marbles, for example)? Are sacred objects more
than just “art?” Are property claims more valuable than respect?
Hopi Bo Lomahquahu, center, with other protesters
outside the auction on Friday. Photo by Michel Euler/Associated Press
More information can be
found:
and
and
And an informative article
published before the auction:
I have chosen not to
display images of the masks on this blog, but the pieces can be viewed at the
Drouot’s auction house, NĂ©ret-Minet Tessier & Sarrou:



No comments:
Post a Comment